Historic Fort Greene Brooklyn

Archive for 2005

December 2 2005 Home Heating Sticker Shock

Friday, December 2nd, 2005

From the Fort Greene Courier, first published December 2, 2005:

-Home Heating Sticker Shock
By Joshua Davis
12/02/2005

Perhaps Arthur Cohen put it best when he used the word “scared” to describe the long walk that he will undoubtedly make to his mailbox this winter. The reason so many Americans, New Yorkers, Brooklynites and this Fort Greene homeowner alike are petrified to get their mail has nothing to do with sleazy credit card offers or the threat of jury duty. Rather, it is due to their home heating bills. It seems like the case every year: winter slips into our homes and the chatter of a rocketing heating cost fills the air. But this year is projected to be much worse than last — to the tune of 30 percent higher for home heating oil and 17 percent higher for electricity to heat the average brownstone.

The Fort Greene Association (FGA) met last week at Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church, 85 South Oxford Street, to discuss ways to save on their energy bills and hold at least a few dollars back from the energy tycoons.

The discussion was led by urban planner Dean Zias, who is with Pratt Institute’s Center for Community Development. He specializes in working for energy efficiency for low to moderate income homeowners. He is also contracted by the New York State Energy and Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) as a NYC Energy $mart Communities Outreach Coordinator.
The following paragraphs are based on Zias’s recommendations for making Fort Greene’s one- to four-family homes and brownstones more energy efficient:

Light Bulbs

Homeowners and renters alike should use compact florescent lights (CFL’s) as opposed to 100-watt incandescent light bulbs. Though a CFL will cost upwards of a few dollars more than an incandescent bulb, it will save significantly more over the long-run. Specifically one CFL bulb can save, on average, $15 annually, according to Zias.

“[CFL’s] produce 90 percent light and 10 percent heat, incandescent bulbs use 90 percent heat, 10 percent light. [Using CFL’s] is the quickest thing you can do to save energy in your home,” said Zias.

Energy Star

The “other big thing” a household can do to save quickly is by purchasing energy efficient appliances with the Energy Star label on them, recommended Zias.

The Energy Star label is something most consumers have become familiar with since it was created in the early 1990s by The Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency. The label guarantees that any appliance will run at least 30 percent more efficient than one without the label.

In addition to checking for the Energy Star label, consumers should always compare the different energy guides on all new appliances before making a purchase, warned Zias.

Home Improvements

For those ready to step into renovations, there are home performance contractors who specialize in increasing the energy efficiency of a household. They are “totally suited for the brownstones in the area here,” said Zias.

The home performance contractors are certified by the Building Performance Institute and they concentrate on looking “at your home as a whole system,” rather than just fixing the plumbing or just insulating the windows and doors. These specialists will do a low-cost assessment (standard fee is $100 - $250) and, says Zias, they will develop ways for a household to save up to 40 percent off future energy bills.

Since home improvements do not always come cheap, NYSERDA has a loan fund as a “low-cost way to finance energy projects.” The New York Energy $mart Loan Fund “provides interest rate reductions on loans for energy-efficiency projects and renewable technologies,” according to a NYSERTA handout provided by Zias.

Renewable Energy Sources

Both solar and geothermal power options are feasible options for many brownstone owners, though they can come with a hefty upfront cost.

Solar panels can run roughly $30,000 and may provide up to about 30 percent of a household’s energy needs. Consumers will pay, however, only about 25 percent of the cost of the panel after a NYSERTA credit and federal and state tax credits for up to a 2.5 kilowatt solar system.

Currently, said Zias, New Jersey offers tax credits on solar systems up to 10 kilowatts, so homeowners can expect New York to soon follow in similar footsteps.

Geothermal energy is produced through underground pipes that take advantage of warmer temperatures below the Earth’s surface. These systems will also run approximately $30,000, but require a feasibility study costing about $10,000. NYSERTA will pay for half of the system and study and other tax credits are also available.

“[The prices] are all coming down,” said Zias. “As they become more common you get economies to scale…as they go into mass production and the prices go down.”

Zias warned, however, that “you don’t want to go to the renewable unless you have an already energy efficient home.”

Phantom Electricity

Many appliances and electronics are built with something called phantom power, or a stand-by mode. Phantom power allows your devise to save certain settings, such as time, date and other presets when the electronic is on in “off-mode.” However, when the electronic is in turned “off,” it can use up to 90 percent of its “on” power requirement, according to Zias.

Laws are being written, said Zias, to eliminate phantom power electronics. In the meantime, homeowners and renters can simply unplug their electronics or keep them on a power strip that can be easily turned on and off.

Deregulation

Because of energy deregulation, New Yorkers have the ability to choose their own energy supplier. Con Edison is obligated to tell its customers of all alternate suppliers in their area. Also, the New York State Public Service Commission has a list of alternate suppliers. Some suppliers are less expensive and/or more environmentally friendly that others.

“If anyone does an honest job of research, they can lower their bill by shopping around,” said Zias.

For More Information

To obtain more information on ways to become more energy efficient, including finding home performance contractors and the New York Energy $mart Loan Fund, NYSERDA is located online at www.nyserda.org and over the phone at 1-866-NYSERDA. Dean Zias can be reached for questions at 718-399-4416 or via email at [email protected]
©Courier-Life Publications 2005
-
From the Fort Greene Courier, first published December 2, 2005:

-Fort Greene’s Alternative to Department Store Holiday Shopping
By Joshua Davis
12/02/2005

The tables were lined with fancy crafts, wines, foods and treats. The merchandise came in all shapes, sizes, colors and smells. One might have though they mistakenly walked into a trade show for the rich and famous, had they not been inside of a church in Fort Greene.

Local artisans and merchants showcased their best goods to the residents of Fort Greene last week in an attempt to raise awareness for what they call a local and unique alternative to department store shopping this holiday season.

The Fort Greene Association (FGA) invited the merchants to their meeting—held at Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church, 85 South Oxford Street—for an hour-long segment entitled “Celebrating Fort Greene’s Merchants.”

Throughout the course of the meeting, the local stores both introduced themselves to their neighbors, as well as discussed benefits of shopping locally.

“For many years we were without good stores and merchants and now we have a lot of really good ones,” said Roslyn Huebener, a FGA board member who organized the event. “Walking around neighborhood stores is even easier than walking around Macy’s.”

A few of the stores that have become new additions to a growing Fort Greene include: Yu, a modern and snazzy accessory store; My Little India, a boutique with Indian-styled home furnishings; The Greene Grape, a tasteful wine and spirit shop named for its proud location; and Veliis, a restaurant with tasty yet hard-to-pronounce cheese appetizers.

The Fulton Street area has become a center of focus for many small business owners. Jason Richelson, general manager of The Greene Grape, is concerned about making the area cleaner and safer to encourage more business.

“The number one thing is to market Fulton Street as a business location and to get people to get out and shop there,” he said.

Richelson, also a interim president of the Fulton Area Business Association, is working on a bid to make the Fulton Street area a business improvement district, which would create a budget for improvements such as increased street cleaning, public safety and marketing.

A fundraiser for the bid is being held on December 8 at the Fort Greene Sports Club, 691 Fulton Street, from 6 to 9 p.m.

Smita Paul is a fashion designer who sells silk hand-woven scarves online and works out of her Fort Greene residence. Her company, Indigo Handloom, is unique in that she will sell scarves at social events, which she calls a Good Karma Party.

The way a Good Karma Party works, says Paul, is that Indigo Handloom will throw a party for a customer once they have assembled at least 25 interested friends. Then Paul will supply drinks and, of course, scarves. At these events the scarves are marked down 25 percent, with an additional 25 percent going to a charity of the host’s choice. Paul also gives some free merchandise to the host.

“It’s a local direct way to raise funds…and more fun than a bake sale,” she said. “It’s a very socially-minded company.”

Ludlow Beckett, former president of the Fort Greene Area Business Association, said, while area stores in the area are surviving, that “every year is a challenge.”

“One of the biggest things is competing with the malls and the bigger stores,” said Beckett.

While concern against competition against larger department stores and big-box retailers was not the main reason for uniting the merchants at the FGA meeting, it was an underlying issue.

“I like independence,” said Huebener. “I prefer individual entrepreneurs who have control over their mind and have a different variety of products to offer, not cookie-cutter stuff that you find in other department stores.”

A similar sentiment was shared by FGA president Phillip Kellogg, who said he prefers to see his local shops in Fort Greene as opposed to “what you see in SoHo with a Gap and Banana Republic and another Gap and another Banana Republic.”

“Fort Greene is filled with unique shops and they are run by neighbors,” said Phillip Kellogg, FGA president. “Those neighbors support themselves with these businesses and the people who work for them. The last thing people want is a whole glut of chain stores.”
©Courier-Life Publications 2005

November 2005 Newsletter

Sunday, November 6th, 2005

2005 Brooklyn Borough President Debates

Friday, October 7th, 2005

DEBATE: Candidates for Brooklyn Borough President 2005-
On September 19, the FGA hosted a debate among the four candidates for the office of Brooklyn Borough President. Pictured (from L-R) are the incumbent Marty Markowitz and challengers Gloria Mattera, Theodore Alatsas and Gary Popkin. 275 people attended the event that was co-sponsored by eight other community groups and organizations.
-
Moderator
-
Brad Lander
Director, Pratt Center for Community Development
Brad Lander is director of the Pratt Institute Center for Community and Environmental Development. The Pratt Center supports community-based organizations in New York City in their work to combat poverty and inequality, to promote sustainable and equitable community development, and to plan and realize futures shaped by community voice and vision. Lander is also an adjunct professor in Pratt’s Graduate Center for Planning and the Environment.
-
Marty Markowitz
-
Democratic Party/Working Families Party
Born and raised in Crown Heights, Borough President Marty Markowitz began his public career at the age of 26 by organizing the Flatbush Tenants Council, which grew into the largest tenants’ advocacy organization in New York State. Marty was elected to the State Senate in 1979, but his dream has always been to lead Brooklyn as borough president, a goal he attained when he arrived in office in 2002.
-
Gloria Mattera

-
Green Party
Gloria Mattera is currently Co-chair of the Green Party of New York State and active in Park Slope Greens local. She was the Green Party candidate for City Council in District 39 in Brooklyn in 2001 and 2003. Gloria has been a long time activist in the universal health care movement and currently serves on the Executive Board of the New York chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program.

-
Theodore Alatsas
-
Republican Party/Conservative Party
Theodore Alatsas, the son of Greek immigrants, was a lifelong resident of Sheepshead Bay before moving to Bergen Beach in 2000. Upon graduation from St. John’s Law School, Theodore began his neighborhood law practice above his parents’ grocery store. Theodore currently has received the endorsement of the Republican and Conservative Parties, and serves in various civic organizations and legal counsel and board member.
-

Gary Popkin
-
Libertarian Party
Gary Popkin is retired after teaching for 34 years at New York City College of Technology. He is now producing a weekly libertarian cable-TV talk show called Hardfire (http://www.Hardfire.net). Gary was elected to community school board 15 in Brooklyn in 1999, and is the temporary chair of the Kings County Affiliate of the Libertarian Party of New York. He lives in Park Slope with his wife and has two grandchildren.
-
-

Presented by the Fort Greene Association
Co-Sponsored by the following Community Organizations:
Atlantic Avenue Betterment Association
Carroll Gardens Neighborhood Association
Clinton Avenue/Wallabout Block Association
Clinton Hill Association
Cobble Hill Association
Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn Partnership
Park Slope Civic Council
Vinegar Hill Association
The Fort Greene Association is grateful to Rev. Dave Dyson, the congregation and the staff of the Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church — for allowing their historic home to serve as Fort Greene’s “Town Hall”. Also, thank you to the Candidates, our Moderator Brad Lander, each of the Co-Sponsoring organizations and especially everyone in the audience for coming out and participating.
-
-Scale Back Atlantic Yards Plan, Says Borough President
By Joe Maniscalco

Originally published in the FORT GREENE COURIER, 09/23/2005. Reproduced by permission of Courier-Life Publications, http://www.fortgreenecourier.com

Say what? With the highly touted Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement inked and developer Bruce Ratner’s deal with the MTA locked up, Borough President Marty Markowitz dropped a bombshell this week when he announced that the multi-billion dollar project bringing skyscrapers and a 18,000-seat basketball arena to the heart of downtown Brooklyn should be scaled down.
Markowitz made the announcement at a candidates debate held at the Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church in Fort Greene on Monday between the Democratic incumbent and challengers Gloria Mattera, representing the Green Party, Theodore Alatsas, running on the Republican/Conservative line and Libertarian candidate Gary Popkin. “We do have to scale down this project,” Markowitz declared. “There is no question. Now is the time for all of us to join together to work cooperatively, collaboratively to downscale this project and to make it more reflective of the needs of the entire community.” Markowitz has been a driving force behind the proposal, which would fulfill his longtime dream of bringing an NBA basketball team to Brooklyn. As anticipated, affordable housing and Ratner’s Atlantic Yards project dominated the debate, which pitted Markowitz against Mattera, a former candidate for New York City Council, who has made her opposition to Ratner’s plan a cornerstone of her campaign for the borough presidency.
The two sparred over the hot-button issues while Alatsas, an attorney active in civic organizations and Popkin, a retired instructor at the NYC College of Technology, expounded on their one-note strategies for improving life in Brooklyn - greater economic development for the former and less government involvement for the latter.
Mattera, a child development specialist, decried the growing power of developers and the dwindling voice of the community in major land-use projects like Atlantic Yards and Brooklyn Bridge Park.
“I think the key question is what fits in the community?” said Mattera. “What are the community’s needs? The community feels that it hasn’t been heard.”
The Green Party candidate called for strengthening neighborhood involvement at the lowest levels of government by giving individual community boards more power in land-use issues.
Mattera also criticized the absence of a strong Brooklyn presence on the City Planning Board.
Markowitz, meanwhile, insisted that “Today, in so many positive ways, Brooklyn is hip and chic.”
As a result, the borough president said that increasing numbers of residents from Manhattan and around the nation were moving to Brooklyn, sparking an “astronomical” demand for housing.
With no room left to build traditional housing, Markowitz suggested that Brooklyn was being forced to build vertically.
“In some neighborhoods you have a real issue of overdevelopment,” he said. That’s why I’ve been aggressive in working to downzone those areas to make sure we maintain the character of those neighborhoods so that those areas that are primarily one- and two-family homes continue to reflect that type of living. Every neighborhood is unique unto itself.”
Markowitz insisted that he uses every opportunity as borough president to vigorously push for affordable housing.
“The first question I ask of each and every developer is to guarantee me a certain percentage of affordable housing,” he said.
Mattera challenged the borough president.
“You asked every developer but one [Ratner],” she said. “Or else you just fell for the lies. The only way to get the private sector to build affordable housing - if that’s how we want to do it - is to say there must be mandatory percentages of affordable housing. Not memorandums of understanding, agreements with some community groups and not others. Mandatory or you don’t build, or you don’t get the incentives,” she said, arguing that the borough president and the City Council could pressure the state to adopt such measures.
Lacking federal subsidies, Markowitz said the borough now has to “leverage the city’s land-use powers with developers that are willing to build and provide the necessary incentives so that we build the maximum amount of affordable housing.”
Mattera charged that “the city planning process has been hijacked by developers and special interests.”
“People who need the housing should be able to talk about what kind of housing they need,” she said. “And we should think about the rent control laws that have been whittled away to seeming non-existence. That’s what we need to strengthen and expand.”
According to Markowitz, upcoming scoping sessions will give the community the opportunity to address environmental issues and traffic and density concerns surrounding the Atlantic Yards plan.
A public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Atlantic Yards project will be held on October 18, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. at New York City College of Technology, 285 Jay Street.
“You and I together now have the greatest opportunity to shape this project to mitigate those absolutely meritorious concerns,” Markowitz told listeners.
But Mattera dismissed the claim. “That’s all very well and good to say now,” she said. “But it’s not up to us. It’s up to you to call up Bruce Ratner and tell him to scale down, don’t take taxpayers’ money and build the arena yourself with your own money.”
Mattera argued that Ratner’s Atlantic Yards plan actually contains far fewer jobs than advertised, and that there was no guarantee that whatever jobs are actually available will go to people in the community.
“Some of the affordable housing,” she said “will be for people making $75,000 annually. Do you consider that affordable when the average income in Brooklyn is under $35,000?”
At the same time, Mattera said that the massive plan would increase the need for police, sanitation and schools in the area.
Alatsas called the project “a landmark that we’re going to appreciate for the next 50, 60, 70 years.”
Popkin said that he didn’t think it was the role of government to decide “who should build what where.”
Mattera called Brooklyn Bridge Park “yet another example of the fact that Brooklynites are not going to get any park space.”
“Brooklyn Bridge Park is an outdoor shopping mall,” she said. “They expect the park to pay for itself. Why does a park have to pay for itself? That’s what the city should be providing for residents.”
Markowitz also used Monday’s forum to reiterate his opposition to Wal-Mart opening in Brooklyn. After meeting with corporate representatives, Marty said Wal-Mart was “absolutely not ready for Brooklyn.”
“If they think they had a fight with Queens, you watch us because we’re the county of Kings,” he declared.
©Courier-Life Publications 2005

October 2005 Newsletter

Thursday, October 6th, 2005

Help Save Admiral’s Row

Saturday, October 1st, 2005

Reprinted with permission
Coalition Steps Up Effort
To Save Decrepit but Historic Houses at Navy Yard
by Raanan Geberer ([email protected]),
published online 10-13-2005
Industrial Park Wants To Demolish Them When It Takes Title to Land
BROOKLYN — Giving new life to a long-running issue, community groups stretching from Boerum Hill to Fort Greene, as well as historic preservation organizations, are stepping up their campaign to save at least some of the historic “Admiral’s Row” officers’ houses at the former Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Meanwhile, the word from Eric Deutsch, president of the Brooklyn Navy Yard industrial park, which occupies most of the former U.S. Navy installation, is that the long-unused houses are so far gone that they can’t be saved.
Indeed, he said, any attempt to replicate them would make it unfeasible for new commercial and industrial businesses to come to this section of the Navy Yard.
What’s making this issue urgent in the eyes of the preservationists, who have banded together under the aegis of the Admiral’s Row Coalition, is the fact that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which owns the houses and surrounding land, has agreed to transfer property rights to the city.
The city would then, according to Deutsch, lease the property to the Navy Yard industrial park. This must go through the city’s ULURP (Uniform Land Use Review Process), and the City Council is expected to decide on the matter by the end of the month.
Some of the many members of the coalition include the Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Fort Greene Association, Pratt Institute, Brooklyn Heights Association, Boerum Hill Association and others.
Paul Palazzo, of the Fort Greene Association, acknowledges that the houses, some of which date back to the Civil War, are in “terrible shape especially the wooden extensions,” and questions a survey the Navy Yard industrial park took about 10 years ago that concluded that they are beyond repair.
The coalition, he says, recently commissioned a new engineering survey by Robert Silman Associates that concluded that “six of the masonry brick buildings are salvageable,” although the buildings’ wood additions and decks, and other buildings that are completely made of wood, are not.
Commenting on reports that a “big box” store was envisioned for the site, Palazzo said, “I spoke to the Farragut Houses tenants’ association. They said they don’t want a box store; what they do want are smaller stores like dry cleaners, day care centers, job training facilities.” These, he said, are the types of uses that could be situated in the refurbished old officers’ houses.
“The point is,” he said, “that this is a piece of Brooklyn history. Brooklynites feel attached to this for a good reason, because of the Brooklyn effort during World War II,” when the Navy Yard was building ships day and night.
‘Not Barracks — Mansions’
Alex Herrera of the New York Landmarks Conservancy also said that the masonry portions of the buildings can be saved, although the roofs would have to be rebuilt, as would wooden additions such as porches.
“These homes were once an important part of the social life of the Navy Yard,” he said. “These were not barracks — they were mansions.”
Simeon Bankoff, executive director of the Historic Districts Council, said that instead of having the city hand the property off to the Navy Yard, the city should “mothball” or weatherproof the houses, then issue an RFP for development ideas.
“These houses are very much worthy of being preserved,” he said, saying they were built in the “Second Empire Style.” By contrast, he said, the officers’ houses on Governors Island are “simpler, plainer.”
Deutsch of the Navy Yard said that the yard plans “to redevelop the site to create more industrial and retail jobs. We would like to use part of the site for more industrial space, and some of the frontage along Flushing Avenue for retail.”
He stressed that the Navy Yard has spent many thousands of dollars and many man-hours inspecting the Admiral’s Row area, and that if the houses were rebuilt, “we would be replicating, not preserving, them — I’ve gone to some of those houses, and then gone back a few weeks later, and the part that I’d been standing in had collapsed.”
Deutsch said the Navy Yard is committed to historic preservation. “We do use a number of 19th century buildings today, and spent several hundred thousands of our own money to rehabilitate the old Navy Hospital and Surgeon’s House, which we only got back [from the federal government] about five years ago. But those were buildings that could be preserved.”
Deutsch and his critics do agree on one thing: that the federal government has been a terrible guardian of the site, allowing the buildings’ condition to go from bad to worse.
After the U.S. Navy closed the original Navy Yard in the mid-1960s, it continued to house some personnel in the officers’ houses until the mid-1970s, but afterward transferred ownership of the site to the Army Corps of Engineers.
© Brooklyn Daily Eagle 2005
All materials posted on brooklyneagle.com are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without written permission, which can be sought by emailing [email protected].
-
-******PRESS RELEASE IMMEDIATE RELEASE******
******Admiral’s Row Coalition calls for Moratorium of Demolition******
(October 7, 2005)
A growing coalition of concerned community organizations including the Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Pratt Institute, Myrtle Avenue Brooklyn Partnership, Brooklyn Heights Association, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance, Boerum Hill Association, The Society for Clinton Hill, New York Preservation Alliance, Farragut Tenants Association, Walt Whitman Houses, Carlton Willoughby Block Association, Municipal Art Society, Vanderbilt Avenue Block Association, and The Historic Wallabout Association have joined voices with the Fort Greene Association to form the Admiral’s Row Coalition.
Together the Coalition is requesting that the City Council and Mayor Michael Bloomberg place a moratorium on the demolition of Admiral’s Row located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. Information released in a recently performed survey of the historic site by noted engineering firm, Robert Silman Associates states “that six of the residential masonry brick buildings are salvageable” has redoubled the efforts of preservationists and developers to halt the demolition of this public asset. The Coalition is requesting that the site be “mothballed” to prevent any further deterioration of the site and in addition a request for proposal be issued for adaptive reuse redevelopment. Redevelopment of the historic asset should be advised by the Coalition with strong attention to the needed community services and quality of life requirements of the surrounding residents of the Farragut, Whitman, and Ingersoll Houses while acknowledging the historic significance of the site located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Paul Palazzo a member of the Fort Greene Association and member of the Coalition states that “mothballing Admiral’s Row now is a low cost solution that will allow the City, the market sector, and the surrounding neighborhoods to make an accurate appraisal of Admiral’s Row. Bringing Admiral’s Row to the open market with guidance from the community will be a win for jobs, a win for the needs of the local residents, and a win for the recognition of the monumental effort and sacrifice made by New Yorkers at this location.”
The Coalition also requests that the City Council alter the proposed ULURP application and bisect the land parcel as to not interfere with the imminent plans of the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation to construct light manufacturing buildings on the land not containing the historic structures. The City Council is expected to vote on the transfer of property by the end of October.
“What I really don’t want to see is a grocery store. What we need are other services in this community” – Mary Andrews, Farragut Tenants Association “
We should not rush to destroy Admiral’s Row. We may be throwing away a huge economic benefit and cultural treasure for the local community and the City of New York.
– Paul Palazzo, Admiral’s Row Coalition.
For further information please contact
Phillip Kellogg, Chair, the Fort Greene Association
718-875-1855
e-mail: [email protected]
Download this October 7 press release
-
-Help the FGA save Admiral’s Row.
Write a letter to the following elected officials today. The Demolition could be as soon as the end of October.
Councilmember Melinda Katz
District Office Address:
104-01 Metropolitan Ave.
Forest Hills, New York, 11375
District Office Phone No.: (718) 544-8800
Fax Phone No.: (718) 544-4452
Manhattan Office Address:
250 Broadway, 17th Floor
New York, 10007
Manhattan Office Phone No.: (212) 788-6981
Email: [email protected]
Councilmemeber David Yassky
District Office Address:
114 Court Street
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
District Office Phone No.: (718) 875-5200
Fax Phone No.: (718) 643-6620
Manhattan Office Address:
250 Broadway, 18th Floor
New York, 10007
Manhattan Office Phone No.: (212) 788-7348
Email: [email protected]
Council Speaker Gifford Miller
District Office Address:
336 East 73rd Street (Suite C)
New York, New York, 10021
District Office Phone No.: (212) 535-5554
Fax Phone No.: (212) 535-6098
Manhattan Office Address:
City Hall
New York, 10007
Manhattan Office Phone No.: (212) 788-7210
Email: [email protected]
Councilmember Letitia James
District Office Address:
67 Hanson Place
Brooklyn, NY, 11217
District Office Phone No.: 718-260-9191
Fax Phone No.: 718-260-9099
Manhattan Office Address:
250 Broadway
NY, 10007
Manhattan Office Phone No.: 212-788-7081
Email: [email protected]
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg
City Hall
New York, NY 10007
PHONE 311 (or 212-NEW-YORK outside NYC)
FAX (212) 788-2460
E-MAIL:http://www.nyc.gov/html/mail/html/mayor.html
-

-
-E-BULLETIN OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL
October 2005, Volume 2 Number 10
19th Century Admirals’ Row Houses To Be Demolished For Supermarket!

The Officer’s Quarters along Flushing Avenue in the Brooklyn Navy Yard have long been unprotected landmarks in need. Originally built around the time of the Civil War for officers and their families, this row of French Empire style masonry and wood buildings (also called Admiral’s Row) have been vacant since the 1970’s. They are part of a six-acre site that is the process of being given over to the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation for new industrial development. The houses themselves have long been neglected, and two of them have sustained recent fire damage (there are six in total). The BNYDC has proposed to demolish the buildings and develop a supermarket on the site, citing job development concerns and the creation of a community amenity. While the development corporation has been, for the most part, a responsible steward for the numerous historic properties under their stewardship, HDC – joined by a coalition of community groups that neighbor the Navy Yard – strenuously objects to the demolition of the historic buildings and is disappointed in the development corporation’s lack of vision.

Our colleagues at the New York Landmarks Conservancy arranged for noted engineer Robert Silman Associates to assess the buildings’ viability and, based on their review, RSA felt “confident that the buildings can be satisfactorily repaired and restored.” The report noted that these buildings could be temporarily stabilized for over five years, which would be more than long enough for the Navy Yard to issue a Request for Proposal for development that would retain or incorporate the buildings, which is what the Coalition for the Preservation of Admiral’s Row is advocating. We believe that the buildings at Admiral’s Row are historic treasures that serve as important reminders of the Brooklyn Navy Yard’s role as one of the largest naval stations in the country. These buildings are a community amenity, and to demolish them for a big-box supermarket, which is planned, flies in the face of forty years of preservation planning. The last step of the public process for the development corporation to gain control of the property will be a hearing at City Council sometime in October.

Please contact CM Miguel Martinez; [email protected], Chair of the Subcommittee on Planning & Depositions and let him know that the Council must insist that the Brooklyn Navy Development Corporation agrees to issue an open call for proposals that incorporate the preservation of Admiral’s Row before they can gain control of the site.

The Advocate for New York City’s Historic Neighborhoods
232 East 11th Street New York NY 10003
tel: 212-614-9107 fax: 212-614-9127 email: [email protected]

-
1.Join the FGA Landmarks Committee
(email to [email protected])
2.Write a letter to the current owners of the property the US Federal Government
Senator Charles E. Schumer
757 Third Avenue
Suite 17-02
New York, NY 10017
Phone: 212-486-4430
Fax: 212-486-7693

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
780 Third Ave
Suite 2601
New York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 688-6262
Fax: (212) 688-7444

Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez
268 Broadway, 2nd Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Phone (718) 599-3658

Copy the letter to:
Councilperson Letitia James
67 Hanson Place
Brooklyn, NY, 11217
Phone: 718-260-9191
Fax: 718-260-9099
3. Testify at the scheduled ULURP hearing at:
City Planning Commission
Wednesday August 24, 2005 10:00AM
Spector Hall
22 Reade Street
New York, NY
For agenda and speaking form visit http://nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/luproc/calendar.pdf

-Admiral’s Row visual tour August 4, 2005.
Views of Officer’s Quarters in the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Notes by Simeon Bankoff, Historic Districts Council.
-

September 2005 Newsletter

Tuesday, September 6th, 2005

July 2005 Fort Greene Association warns of imminent historical loss at Brooklyn Navy Yard

Thursday, July 7th, 2005

Help Save Admiral’s Row

- Join the FGA Landmarks Committee
(email to [email protected])
Write a letter to the current owners of the property the US Federal Government
Senator Charles E. Schumer
757 Third Avenue
Suite 17-02
New York, NY 10017
Phone: 212-486-4430
Fax: 212-486-7693

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
780 Third Ave
Suite 2601
New York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 688-6262
Fax: (212) 688-7444

Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez
268 Broadway, 2nd Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Phone (718) 599-3658

Copy the letter to:
Councilperson Letitia James
67 Hanson Place
Brooklyn, NY, 11217
Phone: 718-260-9191
Fax: 718-260-9099

Admiral’s Row visual tour August 4, 2005.
Views of Officer’s Quarters in the Brooklyn Navy Yard.

Another interior. Again, walls & floor appear stable.

Interior of one of the buildings. Interior walls are stable, as are the majority of floors.

Two views of interior staircases. Again, stairs and masonry walls appear to be stable.

Interior of one of the buildings. Note stability of hearth

Exterior walls, note that windows have been covered with Lexan to prevent further water penetration.

Interior of one of the buildings. Note stability of hearth

Notes by Simeon Bankoff, Historic Districts Council.
-

July 26, 2005 The Fort Greene Association [FGA] warns the com-
munity of New York of the imminent destruction of the historic
structures known as Admiral’s Row located in the Brooklyn Navy
Yard.
As presented to Brooklyn Community Board 2 on June 23rd by Eric
Deutsch of the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation
[BNYDC] the buildings which are currently owned by the US Army
Corps of Engineers have been seriously neglected and are to be dis-
charged to the City of New York. Upon completion of this trans-
action the BNYDC plans to demolish them to make way for
retail box stores.
According to Paul Palazzo, chair of the FGA Landmarks Action
Committee “It is ironic that the Federal Government which owns
Admiral’s Row has chosen to neglect the same structures which
served to protect it. Now we have the opportunity to rectify this
wrong by acknowledging our past while building for the future.
The restoration and incorporation of Admiral’s Row into the over-
all development plans for the Navy Yard will enhance BNYDC’s
previous and ongoing restoration efforts and importantly provide
a more complete depiction of the area’s history. The FGA calls
for the adaptive reuse of Admiral’s Row thereby saluting the
Navy Yard’s historical service while at the same time providing
the surrounding community with needed retail services.”
Simeon Bankoff of The Historic Districts Council [HDC] agrees
with the FGA on its position of adaptive reuse and urged BNYDC
in writing stating “Today, seven of the ten Admiral’s Row houses.
Which were built between 1864 and 1901, still remain. While in
declining condition, they certainly could be restored to their original
grandeur and serve as vital components, both historically and
practically for this neighborhood. They could be easily incorporated
into the Navy Yard plans and provide much needed retail or com-
mercial spaces for the community.”

The FGA asks BNYDC to reconsider their inflexible position as
formerly they have been a great steward of the Navy Yard performing
other restorations which have revitalized and preserved the Navy
Yard’s character. In addition the FGA calls on the entire City Council
to act appropriately and link the transfer of these properties to the
City of New York to historic preservation when this issue comes be-
fore the body for vote in the city ULURP process.
“One thing is certain, once these building are destroyed so will be a
piece of New York’s history; a piece of history that demonstrates
New York’s service and sacrifice to the Nation. It is shameful that we
choose not to honor this history especially in a time of war.”
–Paul Palazzo, FGA
For further information please contact
the Fort Greene Association 718-875-1855
e-mail: the [email protected]
web: www.HistoricFortGreene.org
For general information on Admiral’s Row visit
www.Officersrow.org

press release June 8 2005 page 1

press release June 5 2005 page 2

July 26, 2005 press release

June 2005 Newsletter

Monday, June 6th, 2005

April 2005 Newsletter

Wednesday, April 6th, 2005

March 2005 Newsletter

Sunday, March 6th, 2005

Newsletter Signup

Find us on Facebook

Local Events

See the full calendar →

Archive

  • 2013 (6)
  • 2012 (72)
  • 2011 (51)
  • 2010 (43)
  • 2009 (19)
  • 2008 (23)
  • 2007 (17)
  • 2006 (16)
  • 2005 (11)
  • 2004 (12)
  • 2003 (1)

Fort Greene on Flickr →

Bookmarked